This issue will present the 5 last articles.Podstawa do oskarżenia Danielsa o zniesławienie
„– Więcej kłamstw od rasistów.”
Jeżeli Konfederacja nie wzniesie sprawy sądowej przeciwko Daniels´owi o pomówienie i zniesławienie, to oznacza, że się podkłada temu żydowi,
że jest organizacją kryptożydów.
Zarzuty o rasizm są absolutnie nieuzasadnione i jednoznacznie pejoratywne.
To podstawa do procesu sądowego o ochronę dóbr.
Sprawa jest łatwa do wygrania — nawet w warszawskim polin. Ewentualna argumentacja obrony, że pomawiający Daniels jest niskiej inteligencji (co
jest oczywiste), nie jest podstawą do zwolnienia go od kary, to z uzasadnieniem obrony, że pozwanemu brakuje zdolności do rozpoznawania czynu.
Bo niski poziom umysłowy sprawcy szkody nie zwalnia go od odpowiedzialności i obowiązku skompensowania tejże szkody wobec powoda.
Review of The Crucifixion of Russia: A New English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together:
Review of The Crucifixion of Russia: A New English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together: A History of the Russians and the Jews, by
Columbus Falco. 2017. (Originally by Alexander Solzhenitsyn).
A Long-Censored Book on Jewish Conduct in Eastern Europe and the USSR. Yikes! Two Sides to anti-Semitism. Verboten!
This repeatedly-suppressed classic is more relevant than ever. There has been a large media wave of Jewish Polonophobia (throughout 2019) designed to
manipulate public opinion in order that the Holocaust Industry can hopefully line its pockets at Poland’s expense (e. g, S447).
This hasbara is based on the narrative that people in Poland and elsewhere in Eastern Europe are bad people, and that they owe the Jews. It is equally
based on the mirror-image narrative: Jews in Eastern Europe were just victims and never did anything wrong.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s book challenges these premises. No wonder it has been censored. The most recent attempt at an English-language translation,
THE CRUCIFIXION OF RUSSIA (by Columbus Falco) has suddenly disappeared from Amazon after being carried for a few months.
Here below is my review of THE CRUCIFIXION OF RUSSIA:
The earlier censorship of Solzhenitsyn’s classic, 200 YEARS TOGETHER, is described by author Columbus Falco, „Published in the original Russian in
2002, the book was received with a firestorm of rage and denunciation from the literary and media world, from the Jews, and from almost the entire
intelligentsia of the established order in the West…immense efforts have been made by the Russian authorities and also by the Western liberal
democratic power structure to ignore 200 YEARS TOGETHER, to suppress it as much as possible, and above all to prevent and interdict the book’s
translation into foreign languages, most especially into English, which has become essentially the worldwide language of our epoch…The Russian
authorities have to this date refused to allow any official English translation of the book to be published”. (p. 2).
Columbus Falco refrains from vainglory about his translation, “This is an attempt to create a READABLE translation of 200 YEARS TOGETHER for a
worldwide English-speaking audience which is—let us be brutally frank—largely dumbed-down and functionally illiterate, due to the degeneration and
destruction of English-speaking society since the end of the Second World War. This horrific truth is the result of a pervasive Cultural Marxism…”
(p. 3; Emphasis in original).
CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLZHENITSYN’S MAGNUM OPUS
So what is so naughty, naughty about this book? Most of it consists of unremarkable information that can be found in standard, non-censored texts.
Agree with author Solzhenitsyn or not, but recognize the fact that he is no lightweight. Solzhenitsyn goes into considerable detail about many
different historical epochs, and clearly has a deep knowledge of the issues that he raises. His approach is balanced. He is sympathetic towards Jews
as well as critical of Jews. The latter evidently does not sit well with many, because it does not comply with the standard Judeocentric narrative, in
which Jews are just victims and can do no wrong. Worse yet, a famous writer is bringing sometimes-unflattering information about Jews to light, and
this is threatening. Hence the censorship.
JEWS IN 19TH CENTURY TSARIST RUSSIA
Far from living in oppression, Russia’s Jews not only had more freedom than the serfs, but also more than the Russian traders and merchants. (pp.
16-17), and this was also true of more recent times. (p. 45). Soon after the Partitions of Poland, Derzhavin visited the area and reported on the Jews
in the then-current manorial society. The Polish nobility had turned over the management of their estates to the Jews (p. 21), and the Jews engaged in
conduct that brought them short-term profits and long-term antagonisms.
Consider the PROPINACJA (taproom). The Jews accumulated wealth by cooperating with each other. (p. 31). They made profits by taking the peasants’
grain to the point of impoverishing them (and causing famine), turning it into brandy, and then encouraging drunkenness. (p. 21, 24). Jews forced
peasants into lifelong debt and crushing poverty by requiring payment, in cattle and tools, for liquor. (p. 31).
In addition, a system of bribery protected this arrangement. Thus, the Polish magnates were on the “take” of part of the wealth squeezed by Jews
out of the peasantry, and, without the Jews and their inventiveness, this system of exploitation could not have functioned, and would have ended. (p.
22). Solzhenitsyn adds that, “…the Jewish business class derived enormous benefit from the helplessness, wastefulness, and impracticality of
landowners…” (p. 54).
The Jews kept moving around in order to prevent an accurate count of their numbers—in order to evade taxes. (p. 25). A delegation of Jews travelled
to St. Petersburg to try to bribe Russian officials to suppress Derzhavin’s report. (p. 28). In 1824, Tsar Alexander I noticed that Jews were
corrupting local inhabitants to the detriment of the treasury and private investors. (p. 32).
Jews were not forced into “parasitic” occupations: They chose them. (p. 31). By the late 19th century (the time of the pogroms), Russian anger had
boiled over, focusing on such things as Jews not making their own bread, engaging in massive overpricing and profiteering, enriching themselves while
impoverishing the muzhik (Russian peasant), and taking control of forests, lands, and taverns. (pp. 78-80).
Nor is it true that the Jews were kept out of “productive” occupations. To the contrary. A concerted 50-year tsarist effort to turn Jews into
farmers attracted few participants (p. 33), and ended in failure. (p. 58). None of the rationalizations for its failure are valid: Other newcomers to
Russian agriculture (Mennonites, Bulgarian and German colonists, etc.), facing the same challenges as the Jews, did quite well. (p. 36). Jewish
farmers neglected farm work (pp. 34-35), and kept drifting back into selling goods and leasing of their property to others to farm. (pp. 56-57). The
century-later efforts by the Communists, to get Jews into farming, fared no better. (p. 208, 251).
Jewish resistance to assimilation is usually framed in terms of the GOY excluding the Jew. It was the other way around. For the first half of the 19th
century, rabbis and kahals (Jewish courts) strenuously resisted enlightenment, including the proffered Russian education to Jews. (p. 38).
Jews have always tended to exaggerate the wrongs they have experienced from others. (p. 42). This applies to such things as double taxation, forced
military service, expulsion from villages, etc. (p. 42, 46, 50).
The Jews of the Vilnius (Wilno), Kaunas, and Grodno regions sided with the Russians during the Poles’ ill-fated January 1863 Insurrection. (p. 69).
This confirms Polish sources.
Mainstream Judaism did not conduct ritual murder. However, it is possible that some Jewish cults did so. (p. 40). [For more, see the book BLOOD
PASSOVER]. As for the PROTOCOLS, their authenticity was rejected early-on by the tsarist government. However, this did not erase legitimate grievances
about Jewish influence. (p. 174).
JEWS IN COMMUNISM: THE USUAL EXCUSES
We often hear that Communist Jews were “not real Jews”. This nonsense is equivalent to saying that Lenin and other Russian Communists were “not
real Russians”—a contrived distinction that Solzhenitsyn refuses to make. (p. 117).
One common exculpation for Jews supporting revolutionary movements, and then Communism, is that of the tsarist system preventing Jews from improving
their lot. This is nonsense. Once the Jews accepted the Russian education system, their numbers increased, to such a spectacular extent (by about
1870: p. 63, 71), in Russian higher education, that quotas (numerus clausus) had to be imposed upon them. This nowadays-called affirmative action
became necessary because Jews were wealthier and thus unfairly advantaged in schooling-related matters. (p. 88).
Hungary is instructive. There, Jewish grievances were the least valid. Hungarian Jews had enjoyed atypical freedoms and a high standard of living, and
there had been no pogroms. Yet the 1919 Hungarian Communism was especially dominated by Jews, and was odiously cruel. (pp. 153-154).
Another exculpation for Jews in Communism was the alleged need for defense against pogroms conducted by the Whites. Not so. The massive influx of Jews
into the Soviet apparatus occurred in late 1917 and 1918, but the White pogroms did not begin until 1919. (p. 121).
THE CRUCIAL ROLE OF JEWS IN COMMUNISM
One can easily make lists of Jews in high positions in the Soviet Union. Influential Jews commonly occurred at a rate 10 or more times the abundance
of Jews in the USSR. (e. g, pp. 143-on, 225-on). Whether or not motivated by „ethnic solidarity”, Jews in authority tended to promote other Jews to
high positions. (p. 138).
However, the Jewish role in Communism goes far beyond what is apparent in any such “grocery list”. For instance, consider what some call the
Judaization of academia, and its impact on the bloody events of 1917. Solzhenitsyn comments, “The February Revolution was carried out by Russian
hands and Russian foolishness. Yet at the same time, its ideology was permeated and dominated by the intransigent hostility to the historical Russian
state that ordinary Russians didn’t have, but the Jews had. So the Russian intelligentsia too had adopted this view.” (p. 98).
Now consider the October Revolution. Lenin contended that the Bolshevik success in the revolution had been made possible by the role of the large
Jewish intelligentsia in several Russian cities. (p. 119). Furthermore, according to Lenin, the October Revolution was preserved by the actions of
Jews against the attempted sabotage by government officials. (p. 128).
The energy and high intelligence of the Jews made them indispensable. (p. 129, 189). In fact, Solzhenitsyn suggests that Soviet Communism lost its
ideological fervor, and began slowly to die of “Russian laziness”, already in the late 1960s, all because the Jews were largely gone. (p. 317).
SOME INTERESTING FACTS
Dekulakization was not just an economic measure. It was a tool to uproot peoples and destroy their traditions and culture. For this reason, Stalin’s
dictatorship can in no sense be accepted as a nationalist (Russian) phenomenon. (p. 221).
Religious Judaism was never persecuted as intensely by the Communists, in the 1920s and 1930s, as was Russian Orthodox Christianity. (p. 306).
High-level Jew Lazar Kaganovich directed the destruction of the Church of the Redeemer. He also wanted to destroy St. Basil’s Cathedral. (p. 223).
The famous mobile gas chambers were not invented by the Nazis. They were developed, in 1937, by Isai Davidovich Berg, a leading Jew in the NKVD. (p.
COMMUNISM IS OK—UNTIL IT NO LONGER SERVES JEWISH INTERESTS
Solzhenitsyn notes the irony that, in the West, there was little effective concern about the Eastern European victims of Communism until it turned on
the Jews. He quips, “15 million peasants were destroyed in the ‘dekulakisation’, 6 million peasants were starved to death in 1932, not even to
mention the mass executions and millions who died in the camps, and at the same time it was fine to politely sign agreements with Soviet leaders, to
lend them money, to shake their ‘honest hands’, to seek their support, and to boast of all this in front of your parliaments. But once it was
specifically JEWS that became the target, then a spark of sympathy ran through the West and it became clear what sort of regime this was.” (p. 346;
Emphasis is Solzhenitsyn’s).
NOWADAYS JEWS DODGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND BLAME THE RUSSIANS (AND, OF COURSE, POLES)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn describes the standard double-standard (one which Poles are all too familiar with), as he describes current Jewish attitudes,
“There are so many such confident voices ready to judge Russia’s many crimes and failings, her inexhaustible guilt towards the Jews—and they so
sincerely believe this guilt to be inexhaustible almost all of them believe it! Meanwhile, their own people are coyly cleared of any responsibility
for their participation in Cheka shootings, for sinking the barges and their doomed human cargo in the White and Caspian seas, for their role in
collectivization, the Ukrainian famine and in all the abominations of the Soviet administration, for their talented zeal in brainwashing the
‘natives’. This is not contrition.” (p. 335).
Of course, Solzhenitsyn is not insinuating that Jews are collectively guilty for Communism. However, Jews should accept collective liability for
Communism and its crimes in much the same way that Germans accept collective liability for Nazism and its crimes. (p. 141, 321). Until they do so,
this issue of the ZYDOKOMUNA (Judeo-Bolshevism) will not go away.
Polska wolna od przesądów
I wolna od krwi….
Kevin MacDonald: kryptożydzi w Kościele
An article in Haaretz (“Israeli Jew turned Catholic priest named head of papal co”) describes one David Maria Jaeger who “converted” from
Judaism to Catholicism and will now become a member of the highest court in the Vatican. The word ‘converted’ is in quotes because it’s apparent
that Jaeger has in no sense ceased being a Jew. Jaeger was born in Tel Aviv and had a Jewish religious education before assuming his high position in
the Church.[A prominent Israeli professor comments:] “He is a special man. … He’s told me about his deep ties to Israel. We didn’t delve
deeply into the reasons for his Christianity. He only gave hints.”
List ws. pedofilii – episkopat sieje zgorszenie wśród maluczkich (
Parafie mają racje, że nie chcą odczytywać tego haniebnego listu napisanego przez żydów z episkopatu.
List całkowicie po żydowsku odwraca uwagę od istoty problemu. Źródłem zła jest Sobór Watykański II, który doprowadził do demoralizacji, a
co ma swoje źródło w porzuceniu doktryny katolickiej przez Watykan. Watykan to siedlisko antychrystów emanujących zło w kościołach lokalnych.
List opluwa Kościół Święty, jest niesprawiedliwy, nierzeczowy, niesmaczny i nie powinien być ogłaszany podczas mszy — bo gorszy małe dzieci.
Czekamy, kiedy zbuntowany czarny kler weźmie sprawę w swoje ręce i wypędzi żydów z episkopatu.
Pierwszy na taczkę: anty-prymas Wojciech Polak.
Red. Gazeta Warszawska
Nie ma słów, aby wyrazić nasz wstyd z powodu skandali seksualnych z udziałem duchownych. Są one powodem wielkiego zgorszenia i domagają się
całkowitego potępienia, a także wyciągnięcia surowych konsekwencji wobec przestępców, oraz wobec osób skrywających takie czyny – napisali
biskupi zebrani na posiedzeniu Rady Stałej Konferencji Episkopatu Polski.
„Przyznajemy, że jako pasterze Kościoła nie uczyniliśmy wszystkiego, aby zapobiec krzywdom” – napisali biskupi do wiernych w liście
przeznaczonym do odczytania w kościołach w niedzielę 26 maja.
If you’re not interested any more » unsubscribe (